Computers, bikes and things I’d like to remember.

The case for a phone as an eBook reader

June 14th, 2010 Posted in General | No Comments »

Ever since the idea of an eBook reader moved beyond the realm of speculative fiction and became a real device you can lay down cash to buy, I have wondered about the utility of such a thing.

In theory, the idea that you can carry the full text of many books in the same physical space as any paper printed book looks like nirvana. I love books and I read them daily. I often wish that I could get access to my books when I’m not near a bookshelf. Surely an eBook reader is what I need.

But eBook readers are heavier than a book, have a limited battery life, don’t all work well in bright sunlight (some do) and often come with nasty proprietary rights management restrictions on what you can do with digital books. They do retain the cachet of being pretty cool though.

For me, an eBook reader would be most useful when I’m forced to wait somewhere. In the queue at a government shopfront renewing my driving licence or registering my car. At my daughter’s dance lesson. I’d slip my hand into the cavernous pocket of my frock coat and… hang on. I don’t wear a frock coat. Where the heck would I slip an eBook?

I do have a phone though. Mine is an HTC Magic phone based on the Android OS. It’s in my pocket all day. It has a bright and clear 320 x 480 screen. I grabbed the free Aldiko eBook reader software from the Android Marketplace and now my phone is an eBook reader.

And I have read several books using just my phone - mostly while waiting for things or filling in time. The fact that it’s in my pocket and is always ready makes it incredibly useful. Would I like a bigger screen? Of course I would but not at the expense of pocket space.

I can’t get this week’s top 10 best selling novels via Aldiko’s auto download and that’s a relief. I do have access to thousands of titles of free content though. That’ll do me for a pocket miracle.

Is it Linux or Free Software or…

May 25th, 2010 Posted in Computing, General | 1 Comment »

In case you missed it, Linux Australia wants to know what you think about Open Source or Free and Open Source or Open Culture or Open Standards or… you get the idea. We have a survey running until May 31 that we’d really like you to click through. If you need more motivation to press your mouse button, one lucky participant will score a free hobbyist ticket to LCA2011 and that’s more than worth a few moments of your time.

http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/lamembersurvey

The survey isn’t perfect. Several people have pointed out ways in which the questions don’t make sense or the fact that submitting from outside Australia isn’t properly acknowledged, but I ask you to give it your best shot. Please forgive any imperfections in the web forms. The LA council really wants to hear what you have to say.

And completely separate from the big picture LA stuff… are YOU working in a Government job (Local, State, Federal) and either using / writing / contributing to / thinking about Free and Open Source Software? Turns out there’s a nascent FOSS Community Of Interest being nurtured inside AGIMO and I’m on it. If you’d like to know what we’re up to or (much better) be a part of it, ping me. Do you know someone who should be involved with a government body looking at this stuff? Again, ping me. The hardest part about gaining FOSS adoption in government is finding the people to talk to.

Once Around Australia - pedalling

May 14th, 2010 Posted in Bikes, General | No Comments »

Peter Heal is at the same time a well known Australian cyclist and an unassuming private man. Pete mixes his passion for cycling with engineering skills, a professional career in the public service, and a firm grip on life as a Dad. Years ago he was a foundation member of the Adelaide Mountain Bike Club and raced mountain bikes both cross country and downhill while most of us were still trying to figure out what a mountain bike is. These days we’re more likely to see him at a World Cup mtb event wearing a VIP pass and keeping an eye on logistics.

For years Pete has studied, built and ridden recumbent bikes. [full disclosure, he built mine] Many. many long distance bike rides have had Pete as either organiser or chief example of how fast a person can go.

Last year Pete rode from the Western Australian coast to the East coast at Bondi and set a new record for the unsupported crossing. At the time we joked “Pete, you should turn left and do a victory lap.”

The idea didn’t go away.

The current record for riding around Australia with no support is 51 days and 17 minutes. Unsupported means no following crew to help you. Just you and whatever you can do alone. Pete is aiming to crack 50 days.

Think about it. 15,000km out on the road, all made possible by your own effort. Riding over 300km a day, every day for week after week.

Those of us following his progress via GPS or reading updates on his Yahoo Group are stunned by his persistence and speed.

As I write this, Pete is just hours from the QLD / NT border and on schedule to do something so close enough to impossible that almost nobody can imagine it. Go Pete.

Digital Preservation Software Platform Installer

May 10th, 2010 Posted in Computing, General | 2 Comments »

The various software components of the Digital Preservation Software Platform developed by our team at the National Archives of Australia have been available as free software via the sourceforge web site for years.

We started out with our Xena software which works out what format a digital object is and converts it to a standards based open format for preservation. Then we created our main workflow tool, the Digital Preservation Recorder (DPR) to manage the whole process of digital preservation and to collect an audit trail while doing so. To round out the suite we have the Manifest Maker app that prepares collections of digital data for processing and the Checksum Checker that keeps an eye on data integrity once lodged in the digital repository.

Xena is pretty popular and usually maintains 500~1000 downloads per month, but DPR is rather less so. Apart from the fact that Xena can be used via its API in many different situations, whereas DPR is tied to a very specific workflow, it has always been the case that setting up DPR has required quite a bit of computer savvy. To get DPR going you need to have Java installed, then ClamAV, OpenOffice and Postgres. Once you have Postgres installed you need to set up three separate databases and configure user permissions. All of this has made it more difficult than we’d like for people to set up and try our software.

So the team created an installer package. The package is a single download containing Xena, DPR, Manifest Maker and Checksum Checker along with Java, OpenOffice, ClamAV and Postgres. It also includes a quick start guide, comprehensive manuals for each of our pieces of software and automated updaters. At the moment, it’s a single Windows executable weighing in at about 400MB. For the time being, Linux and Mac users still need to install the various components individually but we’re working on packages there as well.

When you run the installer, it neatly installs everything you need and does all of the configuration for you. This used to take an hour or two for someone who knew exactly what they were doing. Now anyone can do it in just a few minutes.

If Digital Preservation interests you and you have a high bandwidth internet connection for the big download and a Windows PC (or virtual image of one), grab a copy of our GPL licensed installer package and give it a try. Then let us know what you think.

A disturbing lack of passport security

April 28th, 2010 Posted in Computing, General | 1 Comment »

We’ve all heard the recent controversy about Australian Passports allegedly being used in the murder of a Hamas leader in Dubai earlier this year. Well, from my observation, there’s no need to go to extreme lengths to get hold of a real Australian Passport from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. They’ll help you!

I applied for a passport via their online service. The convoluted process ends with your being presented with a PDF you can print out. It’s essentially a replica of the paper form you might use but with all of the information filled in with a nice computer generated font. At the same time they send an email to your nominated email address telling you to take the paper document in to a passport office for processing. So far, so good.

I made an appointment with my passport office and duly proved my identity and paid lots of money. I was told I’d receive an email within ten working days to advise me that my passport could be picked up at the same place. Off I went to wait.

Ten days went by with no email. I took to searching my spam for a missing advice. Nothing. So I grasped the nettle and jumped through the online hoops to authenticate myself via their web site and lo and behold, the advice had been sent out a week ago! To the wrong email address.

In spite of the fact that I had earlier received email from them to confirm my application, somehow the address had been corrupted in the meantime. I assumed an operator keying error, but I was wrong.

So I fronted up to collect my passport today and gave my name. No effort was made to check my identity. Not even the minimal one of comparing the passport’s photo with my face. “Print your name, your phone number, the date and sign here…” I did and I broached my concern. I told the person serving me that I had received no notification because the email had been sent to the wrong address. I expressed my worry that the random recipient of that email could have made it to the passport office before me and collected my passport. The attendant tut-tutted and said that the email address is scanned and recognised by a computer, so no keying error was possible, so it must have been my handwriting.

Except the email address on the form was in their computer generated font. Except I’d already had a valid email from them. Except even if I had filled the form in by hand and stuffed it up, shouldn’t they check that the person who received the email and turns up to collect the passport is the right person?

And finally, when someone tries to calmly and politely point out a perceived flaw in their security, wouldn’t you think that DFAT staff might be ready to listen?

Innovative Ideas Forum 2010 (iif2010)

April 20th, 2010 Posted in Computing, General | 1 Comment »

Last Friday I attended the annual Innovative Ideas Forum at the National Library of Australia (NLA). This event brings together speakers from a range of backgrounds to deliver presentations around the theme of innovation to an audience mostly drawn from those who have a relationship with the NLA. I was there because I work for the National Archives and indeed I saw several archives colleagues there, heard many conversations around me in the audience from librarians, observed a few people from the Free and Open Source Software Community and I recognised a handful of academics. I think that the majority of those who attended were from the cultural sector one way or another, but it was a big auditorium and very full, so I may have missed a lot of people.

At the outset, Warwick Cathro, an NLA Assistant Director General (wearing an NLA promotional T Shirt!) exhorted the audience to live-blog with the tag iif2010 or to tweet with the hashtag #iif2010. The free wireless network available in the auditorium made this possible, but not necessarily easy. I brought along a very capable little EeePC netbook with which I took notes and watched the twitter stream. I’m not sure how anyone can listen properly to a speaker, interpret projected presentation slides, take notes and tweet at the same time. I managed three out of four with a lot of concentration but I collected barely 1489 words of notes across 6 speakers through the day. I may have had a better Twitter experience if the netbook didn’t keep needing to have its network connection reset. I even tried Tweetdeck during the morning session in an attempt to stay connected but I think the whole Twitter side of the event was lost on me.

The first speaker was Dr Genevieve Bell, an anthropologist working for Intel Corp in the USA. Just the idea that Intel employs an anthropologist had me sit up and take notice. Genevieve combined stellar public speaking skills with an incredibly interesting insight into her past and into the fascinating work that she does for Intel and others in looking into the reality of household and personal circumstances now and in the future. Her insights into changing global demographic trends touched on an ageing population, increasing urbanisation, more single occupant homes, greater influence from non western countries and the purchasing power of women - among many other things. Her 50 minutes passed all too quickly.

You possibly know Mark Pesce from such TV shows as The New Inventors. Mark delivered a meticulously prepared and thoughtful presentation loosely concerned with eBooks (whither the book?). He tempers passion with panache, exposed his conviction with a deft touch and drew us into a carefully constructed thesis on the current and future state of the book. I’m still re-reading his blog.

Brianna Laugher drew an interesting parallel between Wikipedia’s impact on the world and its impact on her. Her diplomatic language around Wikipedia’s current troubles and the possible virtue of forks made it hard to see where she stands in the current circumstances. Good points about the ways in which the Internet makes it easy for any idea to have a chance because up front costs are insignificant but the observation that failure (and plenty of it) comes for free. Central theme seemed to be the idea of taking off-line the collaboration skills learned online to boost other projects.

Kent Fitch is a programmer working at the NLA. Great to see a member of the NLA’s IT staff take the stage to deliver a presentation. That it was clever and insightful was a bonus. That it showcased a new style of presentation delivery was icing on the cake and of great interest to me. I truly cannot imagine the same from my own organisation’s IT department. I think Kent probably made too much use of quoting historical or contemporary thinkers but his central message that libraries need to embrace revolutionary technologies (as he was clearly doing) made sense and was well supported by his presentation.

Lunch in the library’s foyer was oustanding and catered by the library’s own Bookplate cafe. A great range of sandwiches, tandoori chicken skewers, hot quiches, small boxes of delightful Mediterranean pasta salad, fresh fruit, mineral water, fruit juice, tea and coffee. I regretted having but one stomach to bring to the occasion. Delicious!

I have seen Nick Gruen speak before and he’s good value. I bet he has a wikipedia page. Yes, he does. When he started and said that he’d be talking about the economy as a machine for making and managing information, I cringed and expected a talk I might sleep through. Bzzzt. Wrong. Nick laid out a thesis concerning a spectrum of public good in which governments have a role in maintaining centralised services (e.g. lighthouses) and private concerns generate other decentralised public goods like gmail and facebook and twitter.
After laying some groundwork, Dr Gruen explored the idea of uncolonised parts of the public good spectrum into which government departments might start to deploy services somewhere between the conservative old world and the new frontier while aiming to serve the public good.

The final speaker was Rob Manson from a Sydney based Augmented Reality development company, MOB. Rob has an obvious passion for technology and its uses. He spoke about the ubiquity of sensors now - smartphones have accelerometers, gps, compass and cameras. Tiny sensors are cheap and can talk to a network. These sensors mean that most of us cast a ‘digital shadow’ whether we intend to or not. He finished with his personal wondering… with all of this information convergence, will I feel as much like an individual in the future?

For me, the day was a great success. A series of very thoughtful and engaging speakers. I learned much on the day and I have a great deal more to ponder and follow up until this time next year. Roll on iif2011.